DNC Courting Rich Donors
Announcing news late on a Friday is widely regarded as an attempt to bury it until the news cycle turns over the weekend. And Monday, February 15th makes a long President’s Day weekend for some. Just a day after the Wisconsin debate in which Hillary Clinton boasted about her 750,000 small donors, The Hill reports that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) will once again allow donations from well-heeled donors and SuperPACs:
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has dismantled the last of its prohibitions on receiving donations from lobbyists and political action committees. … The DNC, which is chaired by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz (D-Fla.), opened the door to K Street donations earlier this summer, when it announced that lobbyists and corporate PACs would once again be allowed to make donations to the annual nominating conventions. That change was made primarily because Congress in 2013 nixed federal financing for conventions, depriving the parties of roughly $20 million to pay for the events.
With the DNC now accepting all lobbyist and PAC donations, it has reversed the policies that were adopted in 2008, when Obama vowed to curb the influence of special interests in Washington.
In her first primary challenge, Wasserman-Schulz herself is facing a more progressive challenger in the primary. The Hill also posted, In primary challenge, Wasserman Schultz faces unprecedented test:
Timothy Canova, a professor at the Shepard Broad College of Law in Florida’s Nova Southeastern University, says Wasserman Schultz’s positions on trade, criminal justice, consumer protection and drug policy reform — among others — are evidence that she’s sold out to corporate interests at the expense of her constituents. …
Canova launched his bid last week on a platform that pulls more than a few pages from that of populist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the Democratic presidential hopeful who’s waged a surprisingly strong challenge to front-runner Hillary Clinton by attacking from the left. …
“People here on the ground — I hear left and right, you name it — are just dissatisfied that she’s not responsive, she takes people for granted, and it’s becoming evident in the way she votes on an awful lot of issues,” Canova said Friday by phone.
“She takes a lot of corporate money, and she votes for corporate interests contrary to the interest of her own constituents.”